AI & Agent Evaluation
575total visitsadmin
reading room / notes / evals

Reading room

Short summaries of AI and agent evaluation research, organized by broad tags.

$ evals.index --public
posts: 13
mode: short summaries
storage: sqlite
status: listening
Sort by source dateLatest firstEarliest first

Filtering by reliability. Clear filter.

ResearchGate — From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: A Survey of Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscape

preprint · source date 2026-05-31 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - As LLMs move from task-specific systems toward open-ended agents, one scalar score is often too opaque. A medical answer, deep-research report, tool-using trajectory, or multimodal output may need separate checks for factuality, completeness, reasoning soundness, evidence use, safety, format compliance, and practical...

arXiv — ProofAgent Harness: Open Infrastructure for Adversarial Evaluation of AI Agents

arXiv paper · source date 2026-05-22 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Agent products increasingly use tools, remember context, handle private data, and interact across many turns, so isolated-output grading misses failures that emerge only through trajectory and pressure. - Static benchmarks can hide selective weakness: an agent may look strong on a headline score while failing through...

arXiv — AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents

arXiv paper · source date 2026-05-19 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Outcome leaderboards are too flat: one pass/fail score hides whether an agent chose the right action, used tools safely, or recovered after an error. - Agent benchmarks reward different behaviors: final success, tool-call validity, repeated-pass consistency, trajectory safety, or attack robustness. That makes...

arXiv — Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities

arXiv paper · source date 2026-05-19 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Standard benchmarks favor tasks that are short, fixed, cheap, and automatically graded. That is useful for scale, but it misses messy deployed work: coordinating tools, resolving unclear requirements, waiting on external systems, and finishing multi-step projects. - Benchmarks can overstate and understate capability....

arXiv — Code as Agent Harness: Toward Executable, Verifiable, and Stateful Agent Systems

arXiv survey · source date 2026-05-18 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Modern LLM agents increasingly succeed or fail because of the runtime around the model: tools, code execution, memory, sandboxes, repositories, validators, permissions, traces, and feedback loops. - Final task success is too flat for this world. It can hide whether the model reasoned well, the harness supplied useful...

Anthropic — Teaching Claude why

research blog · source date 2026-05-08 · 1 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Anthropic studies “agentic misalignment,” where an AI agent in fictional ethical dilemmas may take goal-preserving or self-serving actions such as blackmail to avoid shutdown. - Passing a narrow honeypot eval is not enough if the training only teaches surface avoidance rather than transferable reasons for aligned...

Google Research — Building better AI benchmarks: How many raters are enough?

research blog + paper · source date 2026-03-31 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Human-backed AI benchmarks often collapse disagreement into a single label even when the task is subjective. - Benchmark builders face an annotation-budget tradeoff: rate more items with fewer raters each, or fewer items with more raters each. - Too few raters can make model comparisons fragile, especially for...

Anthropic — Harness design for long-running application development

engineering blog · source date 2026-03-24 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Long-running coding and frontend-generation agents degrade as context fills, coherence drops, and models develop “context anxiety.” - A single agent may be too generous when judging its own work, especially on subjective outputs such as design quality. - For long tasks, the surrounding harness can matter as much as...

Anthropic — Eval awareness in Claude Opus 4.6’s BrowseComp performance

engineering blog · source date 2026-03-06 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Anthropic reports cases where Claude Opus 4.6 inferred it might be inside BrowseComp, searched for benchmark materials, and found or decrypted answer keys. - Web-enabled evaluations are vulnerable to public contamination from papers, blog posts, GitHub repositories, answer keys, and benchmark discussions. - The...

OpenAI Developers — Run long horizon tasks with Codex

developer blog · source date 2026-02-23 · 1 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - OpenAI's developer post frames long-horizon reliability as a major shift for coding agents: real work requires maintaining intent across extended tasks, not just solving isolated snippets. - Longer tasks create failure modes that short benchmarks miss: requirement drift, context loss, weak recovery, unreviewable...

Anthropic — Quantifying infrastructure noise in agentic coding evals

engineering blog · source date 2026-02-05 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Agentic coding benchmarks are sensitive to infrastructure: CPU, RAM, timeouts, container limits, filesystem behavior, and sandbox configuration. - Infrastructure differences can move scores by several percentage points, sometimes more than the reported gap between leaderboard models. - Strict resource ceilings can...

Anthropic — Designing AI-resistant technical evaluations

engineering blog · source date 2026-01-21 · 0 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Anthropic's performance-engineering take-home interview lost signal as Claude became strong enough to solve earlier versions of the task. - Static technical evaluations decay when AI assistance improves; a task that once measured human skill can become a test of whether the candidate uses a strong enough model. -...

Anthropic — Demystifying evals for AI agents

engineering blog · source date 2026-01-09 · 1 comments · original

1. Problems / challenges / motivations - Agent evals are different from single-turn chat evals because agents use tools, change external state, and may fail across multiple turns even when the final answer sounds correct. - Final-message grading misses the most important question: did the task actually succeed in the environment, database, browser, files,...