AI & Agent Evaluation
2,151total visitsadmin

Effective Context Engineering for AI Agents

engineering blog · source date 2025-09-29 · added 2026-08-07 15:52:43 · updated 2026-08-07 15:52:43 · Open original blog

Problems / challenges / motivations

  • Prompt engineering assumes a fixed instruction; agents assemble a different context at every step.
  • Long-horizon agents run past any context window, so something has to decide what survives.
  • The field lacked shared vocabulary for what that decision process is.

Key ideas

  • Frames context engineering as the successor to prompt engineering: curating the minimal high-signal token set at each inference step.
  • Core techniques: just-in-time retrieval instead of pre-loading, compaction for long-horizon tasks, deliberate tool design, and sub-agent context isolation.
  • Establishes the vocabulary the field now uses when discussing agent context.

Why it matters for AI engineering

  • This is the canonical vendor definition, echoed by nearly every 2026 practitioner piece (LangChain, Sourcegraph, Phil Schmid, Manus) and cited repeatedly by in-window work — which is why it is included despite the pre-window date.
  • Sub-agent context isolation in particular became a standard structural move, not just an optimization.
  • Caveat: out-of-window (September 2025) and a definitional position piece rather than an empirical study. Related token-savings figures cited elsewhere (Anthropic context editing and memory tool: 84% token savings, +39% on 100-turn tasks) are first-party and self-reported.

Comments

No comments yet.